vs fal.aiUp to 68% savings

Fleek vs fal.ai: Image Generation Pricing Comparison (2026)

50-68% cheaper image generation vs fal.ai

TL;DR

Fleek is 50-68% cheaper on FLUX and Stable Diffusion models. fal.ai has more image-specific features like ControlNet, inpainting, and real-time canvas. For basic generation at scale, Fleek wins on price. For advanced image manipulation, fal.ai has the tooling edge.

fal.ai has built a solid reputation in the image generation space. Good developer experience, lots of models, features like ControlNet and inpainting. They're a reasonable choice for production image workloads.

Fleek approaches image generation differently. Our GPU-second pricing means faster generation directly translates to lower cost. On FLUX models, our Blackwell optimization delivers significant savings.

This comparison breaks down the pricing, explores the feature differences, and helps you decide which platform fits your image generation needs.

Pricing Comparison

ModelFleekfal.aiSavings
FLUX.2 Pro1024x1024~$0.015/image$0.030/image50%
FLUX.2 Dev~$0.008/image$0.025/image68%
FLUX.2 Schnell~$0.003/image$0.006/image50%
SDXL~$0.006/image$0.012/image50%
SD 3.5 Large~$0.010/image$0.020/image50%

Prices for standard 1024x1024 generation. Higher resolutions cost proportionally more. fal.ai has feature-specific pricing for ControlNet, inpainting, etc.

How Each Platform Works

How Fleek Works

Fleek charges per GPU-second for image generation. Faster models like FLUX Schnell cost less per image because they generate faster. Our Blackwell GPUs with optimized diffusion pipelines maximize throughput.

For image models, you get the same $0.0025/GPU-sec rate. A model that generates in 2 seconds costs ~$0.005, one that takes 6 seconds costs ~$0.015.

f

How fal.ai Works

fal.ai uses per-image or per-megapixel pricing depending on the model. They've built extensive tooling around image workflows: ControlNet for guided generation, inpainting for editing, real-time canvas for interactive use.

Their pricing is straightforward for basic generation. Advanced features like ControlNet often have additional costs. Enterprise plans offer volume discounts.

Feature Comparison

Fleek Advantages

  • 50-68% cheaper on FLUX models
  • Simple GPU-second pricing
  • Custom model deployment at the same rate
  • Blackwell optimization for diffusion models
  • Price drops as generation gets faster
  • Private model optimization coming soon—same pricing

fal.ai Strengths

  • ControlNet support for guided generation
  • Inpainting and outpainting features
  • Real-time canvas for interactive editing
  • Larger image model selection
  • Face restoration and enhancement tools
  • Better SDKs for image-specific workflows

When to Use Each

Use Fleek when...

  • Running high-volume FLUX or SDXL generation
  • Cost is the primary concern
  • You have straightforward generation needs
  • Custom image model deployment is needed
  • Building applications where generation is a commodity

Use fal.ai when...

  • You need ControlNet or guided generation
  • Inpainting and editing features are important
  • Building interactive image editing tools
  • Face restoration or enhancement is needed
  • You want real-time canvas features

Switching from fal.ai

Migration Difficulty:Easy

Basic generation API calls are similar. If you're using fal.ai's advanced features (ControlNet, inpainting), you'll need alternative solutions on Fleek or handle those features differently.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Fleek support ControlNet?

Currently, Fleek focuses on standard image generation without ControlNet support. If guided generation with reference images is critical, fal.ai has better tooling. We're evaluating ControlNet support for future releases.

Which is faster for FLUX generation?

Both platforms optimize FLUX models. Actual speed depends on model variant, resolution, and load. Fleek's GPU-second pricing means our speed optimizations directly benefit your cost.

Can I do image editing on Fleek?

Fleek is focused on image generation, not editing. For inpainting, outpainting, or manipulation, fal.ai's specialized tools are better suited. You can use both platforms together.

How does pricing scale with image resolution?

Both platforms charge more for higher resolutions. Fleek's GPU-second pricing scales naturally—longer generation time means higher cost. fal.ai uses megapixel-based pricing for some models.

Can Fleek optimize private or proprietary image models?

Coming soon. We're building support for any model—not just the open-source ones we showcase. Upload your custom diffusion model, and we'll apply the same optimization. Same $0.0025/GPU-sec pricing, no custom model premium. Launching in the coming weeks.

The Verdict

For straight image generation at volume, Fleek saves 50-68% over fal.ai. If you're generating thousands of images and don't need advanced features, that adds up fast.

fal.ai wins on features. ControlNet, inpainting, real-time canvas—they've built serious tooling for image workflows. If those features are central to your application, the cost difference may be worth it.

The practical approach: use Fleek for bulk generation, fal.ai for specialized editing and manipulation.

Note: Fleek is actively expanding model support with new models added regularly. Features where competitors currently have an edge may become available on Fleek over time. Our goal is universal model optimization—supporting any model from any source at the lowest possible cost.

Ready to see the savings for yourself?

Run your numbers in our calculator or get started with $5 free.

Try the Calculator